The Panoptix Trifocal IOL: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance | ASCRS
Presentation
The Panoptix Trifocal IOL: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
May 2020
Meeting: 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting
Session: SPS-108 Trifocal IOLs
Authors: John A. Hovanesian, MD, Quentin Allen MD, Michael Jones MD
You do not have access to this library

This content is accessible only to 2020 ASCRS Virtual Annual Meeting attendees. If you attended the virtual meeting, please log in with the account associated with your virtual meeting registration.  To log in, click the teal "Login" button in the upper right-hand corner of this page.

Purpose
To determine how patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and spectacle independence compare between an FDA approved trifocal lens and other multifocal lenses using a validated patient-reported outcome instrument.

Methods
We administered a questionnaire instrument in 60 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with the Panoptix trifocal implant at least 2 months previously. Patients with significant ocular pathology, PCO, or with residual refractive error of ≥ 0.5 D of sphere or 0.75 D of cylinder were excluded. Questions explored satisfaction, need for glasses for any activity, and incidence and severity of glare and haloes in Panoptix patients. These responses were compared to responses to the same questionnaire among patients who had mini-monovision with 2.5-add multifocal, mixed 2.5- and 3.0-add multifocals, and patients with bilateral 3.0-add multifocal lenses.

Results
Thirty-six patients had Panoptix, 102 had ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision, & 89 had paired ReSTOR 2.5 and 3.0 IOLs. Full spectacle independence was seen in 83%, 27%, and 31%, respectively (P<0.0001). Top box satisfaction was in 83%, 75%, and 74% (P<0.32, NS). “Very satisfied” or “satisfied” was reported in 97%, 93%, and 92% (P<0.38, NS). Glare and haloes were reported “not at all” or “just a little” by 72%, 74%, and 71%, respectively (P<0.82, NS). Among patients requiring glasses for any activity, Panoptix patients required them only for reading, while patients with the other lenses required them for reading, driving, TV, and sports/hobbies (P<0.05).

Conclusion
Panopitix gives a highly significant improvement in spectacle independence relative to earlier multifocals. Only reading required spectacles among Panoptix patients, whereas other IOLs required spectacles for more activities. Satisfaction is higher with Panoptix but not significantly. Glare and haloes are comparable to previous generation lenses.
View More Presentations from this Session

This presentation is from the session "SPS-108 Trifocal IOLs" from the 2020 ASCRS Virtual Annual Meeting held on May 16-17, 2020.

We use cookies to measure site performance and improve your experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Legal Notice.