The Panoptix Trifocal IOL: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance | ASCRS
The Panoptix Trifocal IOL: A Study of Patient Satisfaction, Visual Disturbances, and Uncorrected Visual Performance
May 2020
Meeting: 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting
Session: SPS-108 Trifocal IOLs
Authors: John A. Hovanesian, MD, Quentin Allen MD, Michael Jones MD
This content is only available for ASCRS Members

This content from the 2020 ASCRS Virtual Annual Meeting is only available to ASCRS members. To log in, click the teal "Login" button in the upper right-hand corner of this page.

To determine how patient satisfaction, visual disturbances, and spectacle independence compare between an FDA approved trifocal lens and other multifocal lenses using a validated patient-reported outcome instrument.

We administered a questionnaire instrument in 60 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with the Panoptix trifocal implant at least 2 months previously. Patients with significant ocular pathology, PCO, or with residual refractive error of ≥ 0.5 D of sphere or 0.75 D of cylinder were excluded. Questions explored satisfaction, need for glasses for any activity, and incidence and severity of glare and haloes in Panoptix patients. These responses were compared to responses to the same questionnaire among patients who had mini-monovision with 2.5-add multifocal, mixed 2.5- and 3.0-add multifocals, and patients with bilateral 3.0-add multifocal lenses.

Thirty-six patients had Panoptix, 102 had ActiveFocus 2.5 mini-monovision, & 89 had paired ReSTOR 2.5 and 3.0 IOLs. Full spectacle independence was seen in 83%, 27%, and 31%, respectively (P<0.0001). Top box satisfaction was in 83%, 75%, and 74% (P<0.32, NS). “Very satisfied” or “satisfied” was reported in 97%, 93%, and 92% (P<0.38, NS). Glare and haloes were reported “not at all” or “just a little” by 72%, 74%, and 71%, respectively (P<0.82, NS). Among patients requiring glasses for any activity, Panoptix patients required them only for reading, while patients with the other lenses required them for reading, driving, TV, and sports/hobbies (P<0.05).

Panopitix gives a highly significant improvement in spectacle independence relative to earlier multifocals. Only reading required spectacles among Panoptix patients, whereas other IOLs required spectacles for more activities. Satisfaction is higher with Panoptix but not significantly. Glare and haloes are comparable to previous generation lenses.
View More Presentations from this Session

This presentation is from the session "SPS-108 Trifocal IOLs" from the 2020 ASCRS Virtual Annual Meeting held on May 16-17, 2020.

We use cookies to measure site performance and improve your experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Legal Notice.